“Landmark” perhaps gets applied too often to court decisions these days, but the Supreme Court of the United States this week decided a pair of cases—Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and ...

This article is the latest in the Health Affairs Forefront featured topic, “Health Policy at a Crossroads,” produced with the support of the Commonwealth Fund and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

The nation’s top court dramatically clawed back power from federal regulators in a tectonic ruling Friday that KO’d decades of precedent and could affect everything from the environment to AI and ...

Chevron is overruled. With those words this week, the Supreme Court upended decades of legal precedent and severely curtailed the power of federal agencies to make rules. Chevron is legal world ...

Buried deep in the 2025 National Defense Authorization Act is a change to federal law that could breathe new life into an often-neglected civil fraud enforcement tool in the coming year. The newly ...

Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. Judges will likely be asked to rule on how changes to federal rules were made and what conclusions were drawn from that process.

Because of the Biden administration’s ambitious regulatory agenda, federal courts over the last few years have had to address the statutory and constitutional boundaries up to which agencies can enact ...

Milbank partners George Canellos and Tawfiq Rangwala and special counsel John Hughes discuss the real-world impact that "SEC v. Jarkesy" will have on SEC enforcement. In a landmark ruling on June 27, ...

Now, judges may be able to rely on their own best interpretation of the law instead of deferring to the agencies when statutes are otherwise vague or ambiguous. The ruling makes it easier to overturn ...