Expense ratios, portfolio size, and weighting strategies set these two consumer staples ETFs apart for investors seeking sector exposure.

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (NYSEMKT:RSPS) and the First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF(NASDAQ:FTXG) differ most in cost, portfolio focus, and recent performance -- with ...

Investors should keep an eye on the consumer sector to gauge whether oil prices have more room to run, according to Societe Generale. The equal weight Consumer Discretionary (RSPD) vs. Consumer ...

The State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (NYSEMKT:XLP) and the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (NYSEMKT:RSPS) both target the U.S. consumer staples sector, but they ...

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF offers equally weighted exposure to 37 consumer staples from the S&P 500. RSPS compares poorly to XLP on cost-efficiency, total returns, ...

VDC charges a much lower expense ratio and holds over 100 stocks, while RSPS is pricier and more concentrated. VDC has delivered slightly better one-year returns, with a narrower historical drawdown.

The value score has significantly deteriorated in the tobacco industry, and to a lesser extent in household products and staple/food retail. Quality has improved in tobacco, though. Based on my S&P ...

Both funds yield around 2.7% and target the same sector, but XLP is far larger and more liquid Both XLP and RSPS focus on U.S. consumer staples stocks, but XLP tracks the largest companies by market ...

RSPS charges a lower expense ratio and has gathered more assets under management than FTXG. FTXG offers a slightly higher dividend yield but has lagged RSPS on one-year and five-year returns. FTXG ...